Microsoft's Apple Mistake, Apple's Artificial Image, Open Source ...

  2006-12-25 22:00:02
There is just something weird about a community of people who promote"open" who don't want to be open with their own names and qualifications. Openness is supposed to improve quality, but if we don't know if a person in a discussion is actually qualified to talk on a subject, wouldn't you think the result would be lower quality?
[I do wish he had given a more specific example of the contrived IDs he's referring to. How are these people driving the discussions? And how does this impact the quality of FOSS? Has Enderle been smoking the poinsettias laying around the office? - dcparris] 
  PNG Image  PNG Image  PNG Image
  Related tags  


This particular article has been collected via RSS syndication. We apologize if it's too brief.
If You wish to publish articles on LinuxStreet.net please contact us.


  Similar articles found on LinuxStreet  
ImageMotorola: Apple will not open the iPhone
ImageEFF berates Apple over open-source iTunes project
ImageDoes Linux Need a $300 Million Ad Campaign?
ImageWhy free software and Apple's iPhone don't mix
ImageOpen Source Fans Push Apple's Market Share Higher
ImageApple Fixes Open Source Vulnerabilities
ImageMac Bloggers Dis G1, Apple's Draconian NDAs
ImageOpen-source Java could result in port to iPhone
ImageGive time to develop artificial brain
ImageThe Influence of Google on Apple

Leave a comment on this article


Captcha

  
Check this if the code you see is not readable and resubmit the form.
(Data you entered will be preserved)



  

Comments (0)