25 Arguments for the Elimination of Copy Protection

  2008-10-20 15:00:03
Can I begin with a few disclaimers? I believe that people who create things deserve to be rewarded for their efforts. Which means that I think that stealing entertainment and software is wrong. Actually, come to think of it, if there was a form of copy protection that was never a hassle for paying customers but which effectively prevented piracy, I might enthusiastically support it. (Go ahead, mock me if you must†'I’ll wait.) With that out the way, I also believe this: Copy protection (also known in recent years as Digital Rights Management) just stinks. At its best, it creates minor but real inconveniences for the people who pay for stuff; at its worst, it badly screws up their experiences with the products they buy. Let’s just say it†'the world would be better off without it. 
  PNG Image  PNG Image  PNG Image
  Related tags  


This particular article has been collected via RSS syndication. We apologize if it's too brief.
If You wish to publish articles on LinuxStreet.net please contact us.


  Similar articles found on LinuxStreet  
ImageLGP Introduces Linux Game Copy Protection
ImageLGP Introduces Linux Game Copy Protection
ImageWhat happened to the guts?
ImageApple rolls out copy protection-free iTunes
ImageR1Soft Announces Hot Copy for Linux
ImageHooray! Blu-ray BD+ hacked!
ImageVista copy protection is defended
ImageWFTL Bytes! for Oct 20, 2008
ImageWhy the Unbundling Windows Sceptics are Wrong
ImageIs Psystar guilty of sophistry?

Leave a comment on this article


Captcha

  
Check this if the code you see is not readable and resubmit the form.
(Data you entered will be preserved)



  

Comments (0)