Self-signed certificates and Firefox 3 - a possible solution

  2008-08-10 15:00:04
Some websites need to handle data securely and assure the end-user they are a) secure and b) who they say they are. The traditional way to achieve these is via Secure Socket Layer. Firefox 3 changed what happens when a self-signed SSL certificate is encountered. It’s a change which has caused some concern and much discussion. Should we only trust certificates signed by third parties? Are there cases where using a self-signed certificate is valid? Should users be informed or warned and how strong should the language of that notification be? Is it possible asimple solution is already available but has been overlooked in all the flan-flinging? I think so. If you've ever been confused about browser security, Ryan Cartwright explains the issues. Read the full story atFreesoftware Magazine
  PNG Image  PNG Image  PNG Image
  Related tags  


This particular article has been collected via RSS syndication. We apologize if it's too brief.
If You wish to publish articles on LinuxStreet.net please contact us.


  Similar articles found on LinuxStreet  
ImageApache and Setting Up SSL
ImagePerspectives extension improves HTTPS security
ImageMicrosoft Hands Out 16,000 SUSE Linux Subscriptions
ImageGet Ready for Better SSL Certificates
ImageCreate your own CA with TinyCA2 (Part 1)
ImageSecure Websites Using SSL And Certificates
ImageRoot Certificate Programs - The root of all trust
ImageSetting up your own certificate authority with gnoMint
ImageCA-Browser Forum Finalises Extended Validation Certificates
ImageMicrosoft invests $100 million more in Novell

Leave a comment on this article


Captcha

  
Check this if the code you see is not readable and resubmit the form.
(Data you entered will be preserved)



  

Comments (0)