Are proprietary maintenance fees worse than open-source maintenance fees?

  2007-12-04 21:00:03
Gartner has gone on the warpath, smacking down proprietary vendors' practice of discounting upfront license fees in order to lock customers into lucrative, ongoing maintenance contracts. The ironic thing is that it sounds somewhat similar to how commercial open-source companies price their software, except that there is no upfront license fees. 
  PNG Image  PNG Image  PNG Image
  Related tags  


This particular article has been collected via RSS syndication. We apologize if it's too brief.
If You wish to publish articles on LinuxStreet.net please contact us.


  Similar articles found on LinuxStreet  
ImageOpen source and innovation as maintenance models
ImageOh Sure, Everyone SAYS they want Open Source Healthcare Solutions...
ImageNovell to SCO: Pay up
ImageBallmer: Microsoft Is Up-Front About Its Money Motive
ImageSCO assets are less than the $26m Novell says it's owed
ImageKDE releases maintenance update
ImageBig Win for Innocent RIAA Defendant
ImageUnix maintenance costs spur Ohio EPA's Linux adoption
Image DE: Foreign ministry:'Cost of Open Source desktop maintenance is by far the low ...
ImageGermany:'Cost of Open Source desktop maintenance is by far the lowest'

Leave a comment on this article


Captcha

  
Check this if the code you see is not readable and resubmit the form.
(Data you entered will be preserved)



  

Comments (0)