Is XHTML V2 a valid successor to HTML5?

  2007-11-21 06:00:02
Some prominent HTML specialists outside the W3C browser vendors, Web developers, authors, and other stakeholders disagree with the direction of XHTML V2. 
  PNG Image  PNG Image  PNG Image
  Related tags  


This particular article has been collected via RSS syndication. We apologize if it's too brief.
If You wish to publish articles on LinuxStreet.net please contact us.


  Similar articles found on LinuxStreet  
ImageWHATWG is doing with HTML5, Web Forms, and XHTML
ImageFix IE Browser XHTML errors with correct MIME type
ImageGStreamer brings HTML5 video support to GTK/WebKit
ImageW3C 'clarifies' HTML 5 v XHTML
ImageHTML5 will incorporate high definition extensions
ImageHTML Dog: The Best-Practice Guide to XHTML and CSS
ImageAHIC's Successor
ImageAn ip_conntrack_max Threshold Script
ImageTim Berners-Lee talks about W3C reform and reinventing HTML
ImageEclipse XML Forms Generator for Red Hat

Leave a comment on this article


Captcha

  
Check this if the code you see is not readable and resubmit the form.
(Data you entered will be preserved)



  

Comments (0)





© 2006-2008 LinuxStreet | Valid CSS | Valid XHTML | Service | Privacy | Add to Favorites
Currently 10 visitor(s) online | Page generated in 0.2162s | SQL Queries: 5 | Powered by SharkCMS