Who pays the DRM man?

  2007-09-26 01:00:02
Playing Al Gores 'An inconvenient truth' adds to the problem it is trying to solve, because the hardware burns 25 to 30 percent more energy than it actually needs to. Why? DRM. Who pays for all that? You, the consumer. Microsoft - and all its DRM buddies - continue to claim up to this very day that DRM won't affect the consumer too much. However, behind closed doors the bird is singing quite another song. 
  PNG Image  PNG Image  PNG Image
  Related tags  


This particular article has been collected via RSS syndication. We apologize if it's too brief.
If You wish to publish articles on LinuxStreet.net please contact us.


  Similar articles found on LinuxStreet  
ImageUK pays lip service to open source in schools
ImageOpenSolaris: nice try, pity about the licence
ImageState of the VNC art
ImageMicrosoft Literally Pays ISO (Sponsors ISO Meeting)
ImagePalm Beach County Turns to Novell to Secure and Manage Its Network
ImageIs Linux now a slave to corporate masters?
ImageWelsh agency pays for open source integration with Cisco kit
ImageNotMac Challenge frees OS X users and pays developers
ImageSlackware: There's something totally sane about it
Image25 Shortcomings of Microsoft Vista OS - A good reason to choose GNU/Linux ...

Leave a comment on this article


Captcha

  
Check this if the code you see is not readable and resubmit the form.
(Data you entered will be preserved)



  

Comments (0)