Google Anlytics shows that average time a visitor spends on our site is: 12min. 23sec. Think about how Your Ad would look like here.
05/08/2010 Relevance: 7.11Much as I hate to admit it, Microsoft does some things better, much better, than Linux. Number one with a bullet is how Microsoft helps programmers and ISVs (independent software vendors). MSDN (Microsoft Software Developer Network) is a wonderful online developer resource. Linux has had nothing to compare. True, there is the Linux Developer Network, which, when it began, looked like it would be the Linux equivalent of MSDN, but it hasn't lived up to its promise. And, I can't overlook the Linux Foundation's Linux training classes. But, if I'm an ISV and I want to write software for Linux, I'm still going to need to piece together a lot of it by myself.Search further
10/16/2008 Relevance: 6.77Today at the Qt Developer Days, Matthias Ettrich of Qt Software, formerly Trolltech, announced a new development environment for Qt Software called Greenhouse. The Qt Developer Days are being held in Munich from October 14 through 15.Search further
10/02/2007 Relevance: 6.56Register Developer is changing. We've moved our base of operations form the UK to Silicon Valley, where under a new editor - the Register's former software editor, Gavin Clarke - we will build on the work of Martin and David, who successfully established Register Developer.Search further
10/09/2006 Relevance: 6.18As an ardent C++ developer, I’m often traumatized by the amount of potentially useful software infrastructure that simply doesn't exist. When working in Java there are multitudes of frameworks and reusable libraries that allow many problems to be solved at high levels of abstraction without reference to the underlying technology. So why are there so many things the C++ developer must do by hand, which a Java developer can do by reusing existing code?Search further
03/11/2010 Relevance: 6.05The GNOME Developer Kit is a Linux distro based on Foresight Linux. Its new release shows a somewhat reduced collection of software for GNOME developers.Search further
03/10/2010 Relevance: 6.05 Das Gnome Developer Kit ist eine Linux-Distribution auf Basis von Foresight Linux. In der neuen Release belegt die Sammlung von Software für die Gnome-Entwicklung deutlich weniger Platz.Search further
03/03/2009 Relevance: 6.02Your editor's adventure with the Android Developer Phone (ADP1) began just before the end of the year. This phone, remember, has the nearly unique selling point that it is lacking any sort of lockdown feature. It will happily run any software which is fed to it, from the kernel on up. It thus brings the promise of free software to a market which has traditionally gone out of its way to avoid enabling any sort of freedom. It's actually possible to control the software we run on our phones - but only if we buy the right phone.Search further
04/07/2008 Relevance: 5.91The ultraportable Asus Eee laptop has been getting a lot of good press recently. Now the company is capitalising on its popularity among Linux users by releasing a software developer kit for the platform. And the good news is that you don’t need even need an Eee to play around with the SDK.Search further
09/01/2008 Relevance: 5.88Korean company MIZI Research, a developer of mobile application platforms based on embedded Linux, has been bought by US based Wind River, a developer of tools claimed to"reduce effort, cost and risk and optimise quality and reliability at all phases of the device software development process, from concept to deployed product." MIZI has 65 employees and, according to Wind River, is one of the earliest Linux pioneers in the mobile market.Search further
04/09/2010 Relevance: 5.75It’s never nice to hear about the demise of a piece of simply brilliant software. when I discovered that get_iplayer was being pulled by its developer I was, to use a cliche, gutted. The potential loss of a piece of software that did just what it said on the tin is bad enough but it was impeccably free and open. What’s more, it was an example to the BBC about how things should be done. It was the work of one lone, unpaid developer, not the product of professional developers subsidised by the BBC licence. What happened exemplifies everything that is wrong with proprietary software. Read the full article atFreesoftware Magazine.Search further