BIND

BIND 10 starts development

04/24/2009  
Relevance: 10.04
The Internet Systems Consortium has announced that it has received enough support from sponsors to launch the BIND 10 project, to create a replacement name server for BIND 9. BIND 9 began its development in 1998 and is the most widely used DNS server software on the Internet. Among the sponsors are the UK's Nominet and Germany's DENIC.
Search further

Buck DNS Monoculture with BIND Alternatives

10/27/2006  
Relevance: 8.68
DNS is fundamental to network operations, but rather surprisingly, given the usual free/open source software community's habit of having multiple versions of everything, it has evolved into a DNS server monoculture dominated by ISC BIND (Berkeley Internet Name Domain). All other issues aside, such as security and performance, monoculture is not healthy. There's a whole world outside of BIND; a pleasant world full of DNS servers that are simple to configure, and reliable and secure to use.
Search further

Tutorial: Buck DNS Monoculture with BIND Alternatives

08/01/2008  
Relevance: 8.63
DNS is fundamental to network operations, but rather surprisingly, given the usual free/open source software community's habit of having multiple versions of everything, it has evolved into a DNS server monoculture dominated by ISC BIND (Berkeley Internet Name Domain). All other issues aside, such as security and performance, monoculture is not healthy. There's a whole world outside of BIND; a pleasant world full of DNS servers that are simple to configure, and reliable and secure to use.
Search further

BIND vulnerability

07/27/2007  
Relevance: 8.27
Whoever runs a version 9 of BIND (more than 50% of the internet is using it as their DNS) in a configuration as a caching name server should read CVE-2007-2925, Trusteer, or the Internet Storm Center, and upgrade their systems.
Search further

Restricting zone transfers with IP addresses in BIND DNS Server

10/13/2007  
Relevance: 8.22
DNS server can be attacked using various techniques such as: [a] DNS spoofing [b] Cache poisoning [c] Registration hijacking One of the simplest ways to defend is limit zone transfers between nameservers by defining ACL. I see many admin allows BIND to transfer zones in bulk outside their network or organization. There is no need to do this. Remember you don't have to make an attacker's life easier. Restricting zone transfers with IP addresses in BIND DNS Server
Search further

Exploit für DoS-Sicherheitslücke in BIND

07/29/2009  
Relevance: 8.09
Über eine präparierte Update-Message lässt sich der freie Nameserver BIND von einem entfernten Rechner aus zum Absturz bringen. Es gibt bereits einen Exploit für das Problem.
Search further

Cebit 2010: DNS-Entwickler arbeiten an Bind 10

03/02/2010  
Relevance: 7.87
In der Open Source Project Lounge in Halle 2 der Cebit geben die Entwickler von Bind 10 eine Vorschau auf die kommende Version des Nameservers und suchen Kontakt zur Community.
Search further

Cebit 2010: Vorschau auf DNS-Server Bind 10

03/02/2010  
Relevance: 7.87
In der Open Source Project Lounge in Halle 2 der Cebit geben die Entwickler von Bind 10 eine Vorschau auf die kommende Version des Nameservers und suchen Kontakt zur Community.
Search further

ISC plant neuen Nameserver Bind 10

04/24/2009  
Relevance: 7.45
Nach zehn Jahren plant das herstellerunabhängige Konsortium ISC eine von Grund auf neue Version des marktführenden DNS-Nameservers Bind. Finanziert von Sponsoren soll alles sicherer, flexibler und skalierender werden, mit Details halten sich die Entwickler aber noch zurück.
Search further

Bind 10 soll diverse Nameserverprobleme lösen

04/25/2009  
Relevance: 7.35
Nach zehn Jahren plant das herstellerunabhängige Internet Systems Consortium eine von Grund auf neue Version des marktführenden DNS-Nameservers Bind. Finanziert von Sponsoren soll alles sicherer, flexibler und skalierender werden, mit Details halten sich die Entwickler aber noch zurück.
Search further

Showing 10 articles of total 34170 in database ( English).

[1]  2  3  4